Just your normal general chatting in here..
Moderator: Moderators
lynch86
Newbie
Posts: 2 Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:11 am
Post
by lynch86 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:18 am
Hi
Getting a 406 soon, I'd love to get a 406 turbo exec.
Unfortunately I'm far from minted so I need to know if it's going to drink too much.
So if you own or have owned a exec or sri turbo could you let me know what sort of mpg you get/got pleease?
Much appreciated
If it's a bit too juicey I'll get the 2.0 16v.
mjb
Site Admin
Posts: 7983 Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Stoke
Post
by mjb » Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:51 am
up to 45mpg at 60mph on the motorway, about 28mpg at M6 lane 3 speeds, 15mpg urban
<steve_earwig> I think this forum is more about keeping our cars going with minimal outlay than giving our cars more reason to go bang
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
Posts: 15033 Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire
Post
by Welly » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:08 am
It's the Urban figure you need to watch, the 2.0T drinks like Peter Barlow on a bad day
In fact the V6 fairs better around town that the 4-pot
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
DiscoPol
Shiny New C5 2.2 Bi-turbo!
Posts: 1682 Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Milanowek Poland. http://milanowek.pl/
Post
by DiscoPol » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:14 am
mjb wrote: up to 45mpg at 60mph on the motorway, about 28mpg at M6 lane 3 speeds, 15mpg urban
Christ I had a 4.4l BMW 740 that did that kinda mpg
Now im paying it all back in a diesel
Welly wrote: Well butter my arse!
lynch86
Newbie
Posts: 2 Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:11 am
Post
by lynch86 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:36 pm
OUch
Guess that's a 8:1 compression ratio for you, love a v6 but there a bit out my budget and hard to find in a saloon.
Think I'll get the 2.0 16v and stick some bits off the gti-6 in to improve the performance.
Thanks guys
turbolag
Officer of the law!
Posts: 763 Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:32 pm
Location: 69 Cleo Lane
Post
by turbolag » Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:17 pm
The 2.2 petrol is quicker, drinks a lot less and has a nicer set of long legs in top, but they're not exactly common on the used market.
eoin27
The Irish 406 addict
Posts: 1131 Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Post
by eoin27 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:11 pm
My 2.0 16v does about 27MPG around town and 50MPG on the Motorway or long journeys. Combined, Im looking at around 34-37 MPG on a tank if I'm careful. Im happy enough with that. Its no HDi but neither is the performance!!!
edit: Can someone tell me the difference between the 2.0 16v engine found in the D9 coupes as opposed to the one found in D8 coupes? They look different.
2000 D9 Coupé 2.0 SE EW10J4 Scarlet Red - 5 litres of oil gone in 500 miles!!! Time for a new coupe me thinks