Problem is I've never bought alloys before so have no idea what size to go for, weather i need anything like spacers i hear you fanatics talk about


Do i just buy two new 195/65/15's or look for a good deal on alloys?

Moderator: Moderators
Oooh, taken the plunge have we?Welly wrote:I've just had 4 x Winter Tyres fitted on Saturday which came off someone else's Volvo last year (they look brand new but have done 'about' 3000 miles) I looked at the all very closely for ages at home and they balanced up lovely down at the place and I watched them rotate on the machine so I'm happy with them (cured my wheel wobble too).
From here http://www.carbibles.com/tyre_bible.html#ixzz2C1wHSw9gAs part of the DOT code (G in the tyre marking above), there is a tyre manufacture date stamped on the sidewall. Oddly this code is sometimes only one one sidewall so you might need to get under your car and look at the inward-facing side of the tyre. Take a look at yours - there will be a three- or four-digit code. This code denotes when the tyre was manufactured, and as a rule-of-thumb, you should never use tyres more than 6 years old. The rubber in tyres degrades over time, irrespective of whether the tyre is being used or not. When you get a tyre change, if you can, see if the tyre place will allow you to inspect the new tyres first. It's not uncommon for these shops to have stuff in stock which is more than 6 years old. The tyre might look brand new, but it will delaminate or have some other failure within weeks of being put on a vehicle.Reading the code. The code is pretty simple. The three-digit code was used for tyres manufactured before 2000. So for example 1 7 6 means it was manufactured in the 17th week of 6th year of the decade. In this case it means 1986. For tyres manufactured in the 90's, the same code holds true but there is a little triangle after the DOT code. So for this example, a tyre manufactured in the 17th week of 1996 would have the code 176triangle
After 2000, the code was switched to a 4-digit code. Same rules apply, so for example 3 0 0 3 means the tyre was manufactured in the 30th week of 2003.
I'd go for part-worns to tied you over, it's by far the easiest and cheapest option and you can forget about it then - you don't hoon around like an loony do you?scotty73 wrote:I been looking at part worns on ebay but then i have to pay probably £10 per corner for fitting, just phoned the place i normally go to and the new ones are £48 part worn are £25 to £35 and he said he's got about 150 of them down there and most of them are crackers.. His words.
I normally go for new but as you say we're all driving on part worns... Oh what to do.![]()
Another thing is my o/s/f has worn uneven, not sure if this is tyre presure or an alignment problem?
M+S? No snowflake on a mountain? I did read recently that there are no standards for M+S tyres, so manufacturers can stick this on any tyre they like.... A quick Google image search later - they sure as hell look like winter tyres anyway. Aha! I can see a snowflake http://www.imgbox.de/users/public/images/SQ4uW0Iu0v.JPGWelly wrote:They're week 40 of 2011![]()
The make is Uniroyal M+S Plus 66, V-ratedand in Xtra Load flavour and in 17"
pretty rare.
The car feels a bit squidgy now and needs more steering input - I guess that's the tread blocks squidging around. They are very quiet to be fair (quieter than the summer tyres) but do make strange noises when accelerating/driving in the wet. When coming to a rest there's the slightest of hints of a wuh...wuh...wuh sound but I expected this.
That makes it sound like a bargain, the bloke has put two away for me i may well pop over in the morning and get him to put them on the front and i'll have my n/s/f one back off him for a rainy day because it's got about 5mm on it.Welly wrote:Sounds fair to me, I've just spend £10.00 per corner fit-only and £49.00 alignment