highlander wrote:sirwiggum wrote:because "its gansta innit?"
My colleague has just got herself a Toyota RAV4. Her Mum and her Mum's partner both also drive RAV4s. She's poorly at the moment (breast cancer) and has recently moved back in with her Mum until she's fit enough. So on the driveway there are three almost-identical 4x4s.
It's quite funny. I told her that all three of them need to dress up in matching black suits & ties and bomb-burst out of their houses one morning shouting "GO GO GO", pile into their RAV4s and speed off, just to make the neighbours think there's an FBI listening post in the neighbourhood.

Could see that working better with blacked-out full-size Range Rovers or Jeep Cherokees!
FarmerPug wrote:i read somewhere, i think it was richard hammond going on about people spending a lot of money modifying cars, but not actually improving them, and a good business opportunity would be to have a de modifying company.
I remember that article. He claimed that his modified Land Rover was a worse car to drove than an old unmodified Land Rover.
I think there may be a market opportunity for a company to take classics and 'upgrade' them, perhaps better suspension, engines, brakes.
However once a small car is badly modified, it is usually a sign that it has been driven inappropriately - revved when cold etc., the handbrake will be shot from the handbrake turns, the suspension from trying to get a lowered car over speed humps etc.