2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Discuss, ask, or get help with engine and mechanical queries in here.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
eoin27
The Irish 406 addict
Posts: 1131
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by eoin27 »

Welly wrote:The plus side is that the 1.8 and 2.0 petrol never seem to go wrong, like, ever
They are pretty much the most reliable engine ever. No MAFs, High Pressure fuel pumps or common rail injectors to worry about. And it doesnt have the awkwardness of the V6 either....or the power :cry:
2000 D9 Coupé 2.0 SE EW10J4 Scarlet Red - 5 litres of oil gone in 500 miles!!! Time for a new coupe me thinks
vision
1.6 8v
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:39 am
Location: Belfast, N. Ireland

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by vision »

The funny thing with the car is that even when fully loaded, ( 5 people and 5 kayaks on the roof), approx 200miles only cost 20quid, though that was in the days when petrol was sub £1/litre.
When I first got it i was doing well to get 300 out of a tank, which would imply that it's more down to my right foot than anything else, but the car always seems happier sitting at 80 on the Mway, or maybe that's just me :roll:
When i filled up last week she got a dose of redex for the first time since i've had it so we'll see if that makes any difference.
Tyres are always at 32-34PSI iirc, must have a nosey into retrofitting the trip computer, always enjoy the games you can play on long journeys to keep yourself entertained... :P
98 1.8 LX 406 Saloon - Dead
05 2.0 HDi 407 Saloon - Slightly more alive

People keep telling me I'm far too patronising - That means I treat them as if they were stupid...
User avatar
swiss
3.0 24v
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: IM IN UR FACEBOOK ADING TEH STRANGES

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by swiss »

Tell you what mate, buy my 1.9. It's reliable and massively economical, and then I can invest the proceeds in a V6 to call my own ^_^
The man with no car

"Close the door on your way out, and don't forget your monkey."
teamster1975
Site Admin & Mad Biker!
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Woking, Surrey

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by teamster1975 »

eoin27 wrote:doesnt have the awkwardness of the V6 either
Say what?! I know I'd like one if I could afford the fuel bill!
1996 406 1.8LX Got a bad case of hydro lock!
1996 406 Executive 2.0 Turbo XU10J2TE No longer hangin' on in there :(
1997 Honda CB500V
2003 Volvo V40 1.8 GDi SE killed by a nutter in a beemer 5 series
2008 Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Titanium X

"Always look on the bright side of life, dedo, dedo dedodedo"
User avatar
eoin27
The Irish 406 addict
Posts: 1131
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by eoin27 »

By awkwardness I just mean that they're difficult to work on cos they're practically shoehorned into the engine bay
2000 D9 Coupé 2.0 SE EW10J4 Scarlet Red - 5 litres of oil gone in 500 miles!!! Time for a new coupe me thinks
teamster1975
Site Admin & Mad Biker!
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Woking, Surrey

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by teamster1975 »

eoin27 wrote:By awkwardness I just mean that they're difficult to work on cos they're practically shoehorned into the engine bay
Ah, you're not kidding there, going by mjb's endeavours!!
1996 406 1.8LX Got a bad case of hydro lock!
1996 406 Executive 2.0 Turbo XU10J2TE No longer hangin' on in there :(
1997 Honda CB500V
2003 Volvo V40 1.8 GDi SE killed by a nutter in a beemer 5 series
2008 Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Titanium X

"Always look on the bright side of life, dedo, dedo dedodedo"
User avatar
mjb
Site Admin
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Stoke

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by mjb »

eoin27 wrote:By awkwardness I just mean that they're difficult to work on cos they're practically shoehorned into the engine bay
Nah, it's just the bloody exhaust manifold getting in the way of the bloody driveshaft bearing nuts... :evil:

In fact I'm actually looking forward to changing my dad's tubby's intercooler LESS than I am changing my V6's PAS pump and high pressure pipe! :shock: (but looking forward to servicing the Golf much, much less than either of those! :cry:)
<steve_earwig> I think this forum is more about keeping our cars going with minimal outlay than giving our cars more reason to go bang
User avatar
kevtherev
2.0 Turbo
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:09 pm
Location: swadlincote

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by kevtherev »

Welly wrote:
The plus side is that the 1.8 and 2.0 petrol never seem to go wrong, like, ever :o
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
1999 d8 1.8 petrol - died at 85163
51 plate hdi 110
johnboy
2.0 16v
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:33 pm
Location: Portsmouth, Hampshire

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by johnboy »

Just bought a 2.1 TD estate for a cheap runaround while mines being fixed.... paid £400 long mot and tax... 178k but these engines go on forever, still pulls well and is good on fuel, im pretty impressed for the price reli.
johnboy
2.0 16v
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:33 pm
Location: Portsmouth, Hampshire

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by johnboy »

Does the 2.1 have an intercooler like the 1.9 turbos?
poddack
2.0 Turbo
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:33 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by poddack »

yes
406 estate, 2.1TD, I fixed her, then part exchanged her for a Mercedes E300TD Avantgarde Estate.
Hmmmm, straight 6 goodness!
User avatar
kevtherev
2.0 Turbo
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:09 pm
Location: swadlincote

Re: 2.1 TD vs 1.8 Petrol

Post by kevtherev »

kevtherev wrote:next month i will brim it ,run 250 mile and brim it again and post the mpg on this thread
well as promised i worked out my mpg.
38 mpg which i am quite chuffed with too be honest
1999 d8 1.8 petrol - died at 85163
51 plate hdi 110
Post Reply