My MOT failure disaster

It's inevitable, resistance is futile!

My MOT failure disaster

Postby Welly » Mon Jan 13, 2014 4:00 pm

Oh dear, just back from the MOT place, I just had to tell someone I'm quite upset:

I got failed on my nearside headlamp aim being slightly too high :cry: and no advisories.

I had the headlights in pieces back in the summer and bent the metal shield what makes the headlamp pattern (projectors) I put in back straight again and thought I'd got it spot-on using my garage door-o-meter but sadly I had failed. There is therefore a slight possibility that I may have been dazzling other road users from time to time for which I do apologise openly on here.

The MOT operative was inconvenienced by two 1/8th turns of the adjuster taking approximately 21 seconds at no charge to myself....now that's service for you.
Volvo Forum Member wrote:Oh do shut up.
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
 
Posts: 14321
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Re: My MOT failure disaster

Postby Captain Jack » Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:00 pm

Bet it took longer than 21 seconds to say what it "failed" on....
Image
2003 - 2008: 1998 Peugeot 406 2.1 TD 110bhp LX Saloon
2008 - 2009: 2004 Honda Accord 2.2 CDTI 136bhp Executive Saloon
2009 - 2013: 2002 Peugeot 406 2.0 HDI 110bhp Executive Saloon
2013 - ????: 2007 Peugeot 407 2.2 HDI 170bhp Executive Saloon (mapped to 213bhp :twisted:)
User avatar
Captain Jack
3.0 24v
 
Posts: 3761
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:26 am
Location: Langford, Somerset

Re: My MOT failure disaster

Postby Rolebama » Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:08 pm

I had the same experience a few years ago, but with the nearside beam being too low, the cheeky ********** wanted to charge me £12.50 to adjust 'both' of them, even though there was nothing wrong with the offside one's aim.
1998 2.1 GLX TD
User avatar
Rolebama
2.0 Turbo
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 3:15 pm
Location: Middlesex (NW London)

Re: My MOT failure disaster

Postby steve_earwig » Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:15 pm

Welly wrote:There is therefore a slight possibility that I may have been dazzling other road users from time to time for which I do apologise openly on here.

Oooooh, you been a bad, bad puddy tat :frown: Unlike the buggers here who must realise their lights are up too high or pointing all over the place and just don't give a toss, or all those twats who fit over-powered bulbs in some kind of power-crazed moron-fest :evil: :evil:

So, it actually passed after a bit of twiddling? I hope so anyway as that's what they do here (every year with the D8, up a lttile bit, then down a little bit :roll: ) That wasn't Franks experience though, the buggers sent him away to fix it and then he had to pay for a re-test :evil:
Talking bollocks sin©e 2007

2004 D9 2.0 HDi 110 Estate lhd VF38ERHZF81657352 - now slod :( :( :(
1991 Yamaha TDM850
2008 Toyota Recall4 2.0 VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVTI ATM LHD JTMBH31V90D007261 - flimsy piece of crap.
1953 Matchless G3LS - Seriously!
User avatar
steve_earwig
Moderator
 
Posts: 18618
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Jastrebarsko, Croatia http://www.jastrebarsko.hr/lokacija/

Re: My MOT failure disaster

Postby Welly » Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:39 pm

steve_earwig wrote:So, it actually passed after a bit of twiddling?


Yes, strangely they went to the trouble of printing out a "refusal certificate" and then a minty-fresh Pass Cert with nothing in the advisory section (the way I want it). Apparently I'm quite free to dispose of the refusal doc at my leisure but VOSA insist on the paperwork being straight (and why not).
Volvo Forum Member wrote:Oh do shut up.
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
 
Posts: 14321
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Re: My MOT failure disaster

Postby jasper5 » Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:35 pm

They obviously have a too high pass rate so they are getting their percentages more inline by issuing a fail for the headlight.
jasper5
3.0 24v
 
Posts: 3593
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:30 pm

Re: My MOT failure disaster

Postby steve_earwig » Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:01 am

That actually sounds like it could be true :roll:
Talking bollocks sin©e 2007

2004 D9 2.0 HDi 110 Estate lhd VF38ERHZF81657352 - now slod :( :( :(
1991 Yamaha TDM850
2008 Toyota Recall4 2.0 VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVTI ATM LHD JTMBH31V90D007261 - flimsy piece of crap.
1953 Matchless G3LS - Seriously!
User avatar
steve_earwig
Moderator
 
Posts: 18618
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Jastrebarsko, Croatia http://www.jastrebarsko.hr/lokacija/

Re: My MOT failure disaster

Postby Welly » Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:16 am

jasper5 wrote:They obviously have a too high pass rate so they are getting their percentages more inline by issuing a fail for the headlight.


You mean the Garage? or VOSA in general? the Garage has only been doing MOT's for about 3 months it's a new venture sort of thing for them (other than servicing etc) the MOT was £45.00 but doesn't it take about 40 mins? that's crap money to make if you ask me; especially when you've got to rent the special MOT ramp which is f*cking expensive.
Volvo Forum Member wrote:Oh do shut up.
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
 
Posts: 14321
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Re: My MOT failure disaster

Postby Captain Jack » Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:21 am

Welly wrote:The MOT was £45.00 but doesn't it take about 40 mins? that's crap money to make if you ask me; especially when you've got to rent the special MOT ramp which is f*cking expensive.


But if they do 8 cars a day, it adds up....
Image
2003 - 2008: 1998 Peugeot 406 2.1 TD 110bhp LX Saloon
2008 - 2009: 2004 Honda Accord 2.2 CDTI 136bhp Executive Saloon
2009 - 2013: 2002 Peugeot 406 2.0 HDI 110bhp Executive Saloon
2013 - ????: 2007 Peugeot 407 2.2 HDI 170bhp Executive Saloon (mapped to 213bhp :twisted:)
User avatar
Captain Jack
3.0 24v
 
Posts: 3761
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:26 am
Location: Langford, Somerset

Re: My MOT failure disaster

Postby rwb » Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:35 am

I'm sure VOSA will appreciate the pedantry.

We had a little tradition where mine would fail every year on a single bulb, and I think this was to keep the garage's failure rate up. I don't think they every charged me for a bulb. The best fail was "side repeater not orange enough" (some of the silvering had come off the bulb).

R-plate 406 1.9 TD LX (1 year) | 02 406 2.0 HDi (90, Siemens) GLX+nav (8 years) | 07 407 2.2 HDi GT (since 2013) | 307cc 2.0 180 | Map of PeugeotForums users offering PP2k
User avatar
rwb
3.0 24v
 
Posts: 2491
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:53 pm
Location: Yorkshireman exiled in Salop

Re: My MOT failure disaster

Postby jasper5 » Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:45 pm

Been to my mot garage with a Honda Jazz this morning, "failed" on a wiper blade split and n/s headlight aim too high.

I bought a wiper blade from them and fitted it and let Steve adjust the headlight for me.

Steve reckoned the writing out of a fail for the headlight aim was to keep the paperwork in order as the lack of headlight aim failures would show up in VOSA checks and they might ask, why?
jasper5
3.0 24v
 
Posts: 3593
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:30 pm

Re: My MOT failure disaster

Postby Doggy » Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:25 pm

rwb wrote:The best fail was "side repeater not orange enough".

You know when you've been Tango-ed
2003 HDi 2.2 6-speed Exec Estate
User avatar
Doggy
Mod with a 2.2 HDi, De-Fapped!
 
Posts: 9797
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Northants


Return to Volvo Corner

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron